By Jimoh Ahmed
The Cathedral Church of Saint Andrew, Imola, Owo, became the epicenter of a heated debate recently when its Diocesan Anglican Bishop, Rt. Rev. Stephen Fagbemi, openly criticized the Federal Lawmaker representing Owo/Ose Federal Constituency, Otunba Timehin Adelegbe, for his perceived inaccessibility to his constituents. The Bishop’s remarks, made during a church service, have since stirred widespread reactions, revealing underlying frustrations within the constituency about political representation and accountability.
The Bishop’s Remarks
Bishop Fagbemi’s comments were direct yet rooted in constructive criticism. He urged Adelegbe to “turn a new leaf” and improve his engagement with the people who elected him. According to the Bishop, accessibility is a fundamental responsibility of any public servant, and failure to meet this expectation alienates constituents and undermines the trust that democracy is built upon.
While delivering his sermon, the Bishop called for self-reflection, not just from Adelegbe but from politicians generally, urging them to prioritize the welfare of the people over personal or party interests. “Leadership requires sacrifice and accessibility,” he emphasized, “and it is the duty of public servants to remain in touch with the needs of their communities.”
Mixed Reactions from Constituents
The Bishop’s comments sparked a flurry of responses from Owo/Ose constituents. Many lauded his bravery in speaking truth to power, particularly from the pulpit. A resident, who identified himself as Edmund, stated, “The least obligation of a public servant elected to serve his constituents is to pick up calls. I’ll put my money on the Lord Bishop here. Adelegbe should embrace criticism and change his ways. All these hubris don’t pay at all.”
Another commenter, who chose to remain anonymous, added, “It’s about time religious leaders took a stand. If our representatives fail us, someone must hold them accountable. The Bishop did exactly what leaders in other sectors should emulate.”
However, there were also dissenting opinions. Some argued that the Bishop’s comments were unnecessary and potentially divisive. A social media user known as HolyCrown remarked, “If a Bishop scolds anyone and he [the accused] goes to the media instead of addressing the issue, it’s a sign of misplaced priorities. Yet, let’s not forget that the Bishop represents moral authority and should guide rather than criticize harshly.”
Adelegbe’s Defense
Responding to the criticism, Otunba Timehin Adelegbe dismissed the allegations as “wicked rumors and blatant lies.” The lawmaker expressed disappointment that such statements were made by a respected clergy, claiming they were based on unverified information from what he described as “faceless individuals” seeking to tarnish his reputation.
“My line is always on, and I make it a point to return all missed calls. I don’t know where this allegation is coming from because the Bishop has never called me without getting a response,” Adelegbe said in his rebuttal.
He also highlighted his achievements over the past six years, pointing to his periodic mega empowerment programs. “It’s on record that I’ve been judged by my constituents as a true representative who genuinely cares for his people. My empowerment programs have impacted students, artisans, market women, and various other groups,” Adelegbe stated.
The lawmaker listed several completed projects in the constituency, including the disbursement of N300 million to fast-track ongoing initiatives. He further noted his active presence during the yuletide season, where he spent over two weeks in the community. “I’m not far from my people. Owo is my home,” he reiterated.
A Broader Reflection
The confrontation between the Bishop and the lawmaker underscores a broader issue within Nigerian politics: the growing disconnect between elected officials and their constituents. While representatives often cite infrastructural projects and empowerment schemes as proof of their commitment, many constituents argue that true representation goes beyond material contributions.
“The problems of these politicians are their sycophantic supporters who would rather trade crumbs for truth,” one resident remarked. Another added, “We’ve normalized mediocrity by accepting token gestures instead of demanding accountability.”
This incident also highlights the critical role of religious and community leaders in fostering accountability. Bishop Fagbemi’s comments reflect a growing expectation that leaders in all spheres should use their platforms to advocate for good governance and societal betterment.
The Role of Constructive Criticism
Constructive criticism, as emphasized by the Bishop, is essential for democracy to thrive. Political analyst, Dr. Samuel Oluwatobi, weighed in on the matter, stating, “Leaders must be open to feedback. Criticism isn’t an attack; it’s an opportunity for growth. Adelegbe should see this as a wake-up call to bridge any perceived gaps between him and his constituents.”
However, Oluwatobi also urged religious leaders to balance their criticisms with dialogue. “While it’s commendable that the Bishop spoke up, it’s equally important to engage leaders privately to ensure that the criticism is received in the spirit of improvement rather than confrontation,” he said.
Moving Forward
The Bishop’s remarks and Adelegbe’s response have ignited a much-needed conversation about political representation in Owo/Ose. Constituents have expressed hope that the lawmaker will take the feedback in stride and make amends where necessary.
“This isn’t about tearing anyone down; it’s about building a better community,” said Edmund. “We need leaders who listen, not just to criticisms but to the everyday struggles of the people they represent.”
Meanwhile, some constituents are calling for a town hall meeting where Adelegbe can directly address their concerns and outline his plans for the remainder of his tenure. Such a forum, they believe, would foster mutual understanding and accountability.
A Test of Leadership
For Adelegbe, this incident represents both a challenge and an opportunity. Will he rise above the controversy and prove his commitment to the people, or will he dismiss the criticisms as unfounded attacks?
As for Bishop Fagbemi, his bold stance has solidified his role as a moral voice within the community. Whether or not his comments will inspire lasting change remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the conversation about accountability in Owo/Ose is far from over.
Ultimately, this episode serves as a reminder that leadership is not just about achievements but about presence, accessibility, and a genuine connection to the people one is elected to serve.
